Signed into law
Romance Scam Prevention Act
This bill requires online dating service providers (i.e., mobile applications or websites) to provide users with a fraud ban notification if the user has established an account with the service and received a message through the service from a banned user of the service.
- Measure
- H.R. 2481 · 119th Congress
- Latest action
- October 20, 2026
- Policy changes
- 2
- Source
- CRS summary (Introduced in House) · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 119-129.
Read it yourself · The summaries below are the Congressional Research Service’s. Under each one you can open the bill’s own wording, or read the full text (enrolled (sent to the President)).
What it would cost
Congressional Budget Office estimate
June 27, 2025 · As ordered reported by the House Committee on Energy and Commerce on April 8, 2025 · Read CBO’s estimate
Open the estimate for CBO’s figures; we haven’t copied them here yet.
Dollar amounts in the bill itself
The bill’s text doesn’t provide or authorize any money directly.
Read from the bill’s text by matching dollar amounts and the words around them; check the linked section before relying on a figure.
Who wrote it
Sponsor
Rep. David G. Valadao (R-CA-22)Joined by 9 cosponsors, 3 of them from the day it was introduced. Introduced March 31, 2025.
All 9 cosponsors
- Rep. Craig A. Goldman (R-TX-12) · original
- Rep. Brittany Pettersen (D-CO-7) · original
- Rep. Thomas R. Suozzi (D-NY-3) · original
- Rep. Juan Ciscomani (R-AZ-6)
- Rep. Josh Harder (D-CA-9)
- Rep. David P. Joyce (R-OH-14)
- Rep. Susie Lee (D-NV-3)
- Rep. Michael Lawler (R-NY-17)
- Rep. Jefferson Shreve (R-IN-6)
How Congress voted
No recorded vote: this bill moved by voice vote or unanimous consent, so there is no record of how individual members voted.
Alaska’s delegation
| Member | On the record |
|---|---|
 Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) | None found |
 Sen. Dan Sullivan (R-AK) | None found |
 Rep. Nicholas J. Begich III (R-AK-AL) | None found |
In their own words
What members have said about this bill, quoted exactly and linked to the source. Your delegation is listed first.
We haven’t found public statements from members about this bill yet.
What it changes — and your vote
One person, one vote · Anyone may read. To vote, verify your identity once with a government-issued ID — we keep no copy of it. Verify to vote
Provision 1
The fraud ban notification must include (1) the username or other profile identifier of the banned user and the most recent time when the user who is receiving the notification sent or received a message through the service to or from the banned user, (2) a statement that the banned user may have been using a false identity or attempting to defraud other users, (3) a statement that the user should not send cash (or another form of currency) or personal financial information to another user, (4) information about avoiding online fraud (e.g., a link to another website or a disclosure) and (5) contact information for the provider's customer service department.
›Read the bill’s wording · Sec. 2(closest match)
The summary doesn’t name a section, so these are the sections whose wording matches it most closely.
Loading the text…
No verified votes yet
Provision 2
Provides for enforcement of these requirements by the Federal Trade Commission and state attorneys general.
›Read the bill’s wording · Sec. 2(closest match)
The summary doesn’t name a section, so these are the sections whose wording matches it most closely.
Loading the text…
No verified votes yet