Signed into law
Sloan Canyon Conservation and Lateral Pipeline Act
This act expands the boundaries of the Sloan Canyon National Conservation Area in Clark County, Nevada, and grants rights-of-way through the conservation area and other land administered by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) for the construction of a water transmission pipeline and related facilities.
- Measure
- H.R. 972 · 119th Congress
- Latest action
- May 19, 2026
- Policy changes
- 4
- Source
- CRS summary (Public Law) · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 119-91.
Read it yourself · The summaries below are the Congressional Research Service’s. Under each one you can open the bill’s own wording, or read the full text (enrolled (sent to the President)).
What it would cost
Congressional Budget Office estimate
August 28, 2025 · As ordered reported by the House Committee on Natural Resources on April 9, 2025 · Read CBO’s estimate
Open the estimate for CBO’s figures; we haven’t copied them here yet.
Dollar amounts in the bill itself
The bill’s text doesn’t provide or authorize any money directly.
Read from the bill’s text by matching dollar amounts and the words around them; check the linked section before relying on a figure.
Who wrote it
How Congress voted
No recorded vote: this bill moved by voice vote or unanimous consent, so there is no record of how individual members voted.
Your delegation
Choose your state to see how your senators and representatives wrote, voted on, and spoke about this bill.
In their own words
What members have said about this bill, quoted exactly and linked to the source.
We haven’t found public statements from members about this bill yet.
What it changes — and your vote
One person, one vote · Anyone may read. To vote, verify your identity once with a government-issued ID — we keep no copy of it. Verify to vote
Provision 1
Specifically, the act requires the BLM to grant certain rights-of-way to the Southern Nevada Water Authority (SNWA) for the purposes of (1) performing geotechnical investigations within the rights-of-way, and (2) constructing and operating a water pipeline and related facilities.
›Read the bill’s wording · Sec. 3(closest match)
The summary doesn’t name a section, so these are the sections whose wording matches it most closely.
Loading the text…
No verified votes yet
Provision 2
The rights-of-way may not be located through or under areas designated as wilderness, and construction of the pipeline may not permanently adversely affect surface resources within the conservation area.
The BLM may place other reasonable terms and conditions on the issuance of rights-of-way as necessary to protect the conservation area’s resources.
›Read the bill’s wording · Sec. 3(closest match)
The summary doesn’t name a section, so these are the sections whose wording matches it most closely.
Loading the text…
No verified votes yet
Provision 3
In tunneling the water pipeline, SNWA may excavate and dispose of sand, gravel, minerals, and other materials as needed.
The BLM must enter into a memorandum of understanding with SNWA to identify federal land on which SNWA may dispose of such materials.
›Read the bill’s wording · Sec. 3(closest match)
The summary doesn’t name a section, so these are the sections whose wording matches it most closely.
Loading the text…
No verified votes yet
Provision 4
Adds approximately 9,290 acres of land to the conservation area.
This expansion of the conservation area is subject to valid existing rights (e.g., utility transmission rights), must not preclude authorized activities within existing rights-of-way or corridors, and must not preclude the BLM from authorizing new utility rights-of-way.
›Read the bill’s wording · Sec. 3(closest match)
The summary doesn’t name a section, so these are the sections whose wording matches it most closely.
Loading the text…
No verified votes yet