Friday, November 6, 2026Verify to vote
The 1776 ConstitutionThe laws of the land, set down plainly — and put to the people, one provision at a time.

Signed into law

Laken Riley Act

This act requires the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to detain certain non-U.S. nationals (aliens under federal law) who have been arrested for burglary, theft, larceny, shoplifting, assault of a law enforcement officer, or any crime that results in death or serious bodily injury to another person. The act also authorizes states to sue the federal government for decisions or alleged failures related to immigration enforcement.

Measure
S. 5 · 119th Congress
Latest action
January 29, 2025
Policy changes
2
Source
CRS summary (Public Law) · Congress.gov

Became Public Law No: 119-1.

Read it yourself · The summaries below are the Congressional Research Service’s. Under each one you can open the bill’s own wording, or read the full text (enrolled (sent to the President)).

What it would cost

Congressional Budget Office estimate

The Congressional Budget Office, Congress’s nonpartisan scorekeeper, hasn’t published a cost estimate for this bill yet.

Dollar amounts in the bill itself

The bill’s text doesn’t provide or authorize any money directly.

5 other dollar figures (thresholds, limits, tax amounts)
  • $100 Sec. 3(3) Enforcement by attorney general of a State The attorney general of a State, or other authorized State officer, alleging a violation of the detention and removal requirements under paragraph (1) or (2) that harms such State or its residents shall have standing to bring an action against the Secretary of Homeland Security on behalf of such State or the residents of such State in an appropriate d…
  • $100 Sec. 3(f) Enforcement by attorney general of a State The attorney general of a State, or other authorized State officer, alleging an action or decision by the Attorney General or Secretary of Homeland Security under this section to release any alien or grant bond or parole to any alien that harms such State or its residents shall have standing to bring an action against the Attorney General or Secretary…
  • $100 Sec. 3(e) Enforcement by attorney general of a State The attorney general of a State, or other authorized State officer, alleging a violation of the requirement to discontinue granting visas to citizens, subjects, nationals, and residents as described in subsection (d) that harms such State or its residents shall have standing to bring an action against the Secretary of State on behalf of such State or …
  • $100 Sec. 3(C) The attorney general of a State, or other authorized State officer, alleging a violation of the limitation under subparagraph (A) that parole solely be granted on a case-by-case basis and solely for urgent humanitarian reasons or a significant public benefit, that harms such State or its residents shall have standing to bring an action against the Secretary of Homeland Security on behalf of su…
  • $100 Sec. 3(B) Enforcement by attorney general of a State The attorney general of a State, or other authorized State officer, alleging a violation of the detention requirement under subparagraph (A) that harms such State or its residents shall have standing to bring an action against the Secretary of Homeland Security on behalf of such State or the residents of such State in an appropriate district court of …

Read from the bill’s text by matching dollar amounts and the words around them; check the linked section before relying on a figure.

Who wrote it

Portrait of Katie Boyd Britt

Sponsor

Sen. Katie Boyd Britt (R-AL)

Joined by 53 cosponsors, 33 of them from the day it was introduced. Introduced January 6, 2025.

All 53 cosponsors

How Congress voted

  • Senate · January 20, 2025

    Passed Senate with an amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 64 - 35. Record Vote Number: 7.

    64 yea · 35 nay · Republicans 52–0 · Democrats 12–33 · Independents 0–2 · Official record

  • House · January 22, 2025

    On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 263 - 156 (Roll no. 23).

    263 yea · 156 nay · 14 other · Republicans 217–0 · Democrats 46–156 · Official record

Your delegation

Choose your state to see how your senators and representatives wrote, voted on, and spoke about this bill.

In their own words

What members have said about this bill, quoted exactly and linked to the source.

We haven’t found public statements from members about this bill yet.

How we find and check statements

What it changes — and your vote

One person, one vote · Anyone may read. To vote, verify your identity once with a government-issued ID — we keep no copy of it. Verify to vote

Provision 1

Under this act, DHS must detain an individual who (1) is unlawfully present in the United States or did not possess the necessary documents when applying for admission; and (2) has been charged with, arrested for, convicted of, or admits to having committed acts that constitute the essential elements of the above crimes.

›Read the bill’s wording · Sec. 2(closest match)

The summary doesn’t name a section, so these are the sections whose wording matches it most closely.

Loading the text…

Verify to vote

No verified votes yet

Provision 2

Authorizes state governments to sue for injunctive relief over certain immigration-related decisions or alleged failures by the federal government if the decision or failure caused the state or its residents harm, including financial harm of more than $100.

Specifically, the state government may sue the federal government over a • decision to release a non-U.S. national from custody; • failure to fulfill requirements relating to inspecting individuals seeking admission into the United States, including requirements related to asylum interviews; • failure to fulfill a requirement to stop issuing visas to nationals of a country that unreasonably denies or delays acceptance of nationals of that country; • violation of limitations on immigration parole, such as the requirement that parole be granted only on a case-by-case basis; or • failure to detain an individual who has been ordered removed from the United States.

›Read the bill’s wording · Sec. 3(closest match)

The summary doesn’t name a section, so these are the sections whose wording matches it most closely.

Loading the text…

Verify to vote

No verified votes yet